Dominic Cummings has but to supply proof to again up the claims he made in a marathon session on the federal government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, MPs have mentioned.
He claimed that the prime minister handled COVID-19 like a “scare story”, Well being Secretary Matt Hancock ought to have been “sacked for mendacity”, and lots of ministers had been “actually snowboarding” because the pandemic was growing early final 12 months.
Mr Cummings additionally mentioned he heard Mr Johnson say he would quite see “our bodies pile excessive” than go into a 3rd lockdown – one thing which the PM has flatly denied.
As well as, he mentioned the federal government’s assertion that it had positioned a “protect” round care houses within the early months of the pandemic was “full nonsense”.
Mr Cummings mentioned he would offer proof to again up his allegations.
The Science and Expertise Committee and the Well being and Social Care Committee wrote to him on 1 June, setting a deadline of final Friday (4 June) for the fabric.
On Wednesday they revealed the letter in full.
“We’ve got revealed our letter to Dominic Cummings requesting documentary and supporting proof,” the Science and Expertise Committee mentioned in a tweet.
“Thus far, we have now not acquired a response.”
Of their letter, the committees say Mr Cummings made “a number of severe allegations”.
“We respect that offering documentary proof of those conversations is probably not attainable,” the MPs word.
“Nevertheless we’re certain you perceive that with out additional proof we have now to contemplate these allegations as unsubstantiated.”
The committee requested for proof to again up plenty of Mr Cummings’ claims in regards to the well being secretary – who was a selected focus of his ire throughout his proof:
• Proof that Mr Hancock was briefed by the federal government’s chief scientific adviser that not all people who required remedy for COVID-19 acquired it
• Proof that the Cupboard secretary mentioned he had “misplaced confidence” within the well being secretary’s “honesty”, together with Mr Cummings’ up to date word of this remark
• Proof that Mr Hancock interfered within the increasing of testing capability in April 2020
• Proof to make clear what assurances Mr Cummings, the PM or cupboard got and when, that sufferers being discharged from hospital into social care had been being examined, and by whom these assurances got
The committee additionally requested for plenty of written exchanges between Mr Cummings and key figures, together with the PM and Mr Hancock, in addition to key paperwork and proof to again up his extra basic claims in regards to the authorities’s pandemic response.
This contains proof on the recommendation given within the run-up to the introduction of tiered restrictions in October and the imposition of a second nationwide lockdown weeks later.
Specifically, the MPs requested for proof to substantiate Mr Cummings’ allegation that Mr Johnson “ignored” recommendation to introduce a brief lockdown in September.